Professor W.J.Witteman [Ref. 1] provides a detailed account of the absorption of thermal emission from the Earth surface by atmospheric CO2. He found that at atmospheric temperatures only a few low-lying vibrational bands of CO2 are relevant. Further, it stated that “Especially the absorbed radiation power by the ground state bending mode at about 15 microns is dominant.” The Conclusion states “The absorption of thermal emission from the earth by CO2 occurs at wavelengths around 15, 5 and 4.3 microns.”
HITRAN CO2 absorption spectrum
For this study, a spectrum for CO2 was calculated using the HITRAN web site facility [Ref.2] for the parameters of temperature of 12̊C and pressure 0.945 atmospheres being the estimated average conditions at about 500 metres above sea level. The result is shown in Figure 1. The section between wavenumbers 400 to 2600 cm^-1 is that referred to in Witteman[Ref.1] as the region of absorption of the thermal emission from the earth.
The calculated HITRAN spectrum listing gave the major peaks as:
a. wavenumber 667.661 cm^-1 , that is, wavelength 14.9777 microns,
frequency 20.016 Tera Hz, amplitude 3.061 x 10^-19 cm/mol,
b. wavenumber 2361.47 cm^-1 ,that is, wavelength 4.23466 microns,
frequency 70.795 Tera Hz, amplitude 3.642 x 10^-18 cm/mol,
c. wavenumber 3727.08 cm^-1 ,that is, wavelength 2.68306 microns,
frequency 111.74 Tera Hz, amplitude 6.092 x 10^-20 cm/mol,
d. wavenumber 4989.97 cm^-1 ,that is, wavelength 2.00402 microns,
frequency 149.6 Tera Hz, amplitude 1.356 x 10^-21 cm/mol.
From inspection of the HITRAN listing, the absorption bands were chosen by taking 1000th of the peak line intensity as their outer limits. This gave the absorption band limits to be:
a. 13.26 to 17.07 microns,
b. 4.189 to 4.377 microns,
c. 2.663 to 2.823 microns, and
d. 1.995 to 2.036 microns.
Earth’s thermal radiation
Applying these values to the Planck function for an average Earth temperature of 15̊C (288̊K) gave the following energy values for the respective absorption bands:
a. energy density 9.174 x 10^-7 Joules per cubic metre, being 0.176 of the total emission and a photon density of 6.917 x 10^+13 photons per cubic metre,
b. energy density 5.618 x 10^-9 J/cu.m., being 0.00108 of the total emission and a photon density of 1.198 x 10^+11 photons per cu. m.,
c. energy density 6.447 x 10^-11 J/cu.m., being 1.24 x 10^-5 of the total emission and a photon density of 8.708 x 10^+8 photons per cu. m.,
d. energy density 1.081 x 10^-13 J/cu.m., being 2.077 x 10^-8 of the total emission and a photon density of 1.091 x 10^+6 photons per cu. m.,
for a total photon density of 6.929 x 10^+13 photons per cu. m. of which the 15 micron band dominates with 99.83% of the total.
Thus the only absorption and re-emission by atmospheric CO2 of any consequence must be the photons in the 15 micron band.
The source temperatures that radiate at the CO2 absorption peaks are:
a. 193.5̊K, ie. -79.5̊C,
b. 685̊K, ie. 412̊C,
c. 1080̊K, ie. 807̊C, and
d. 1446̊K, ie. 1173̊C.
Since 99.83% of the photons that may be absorbed by the atmospheric CO2 molecules will be from the 15 micron absorption band and these represent radiation from a source at 193.5̊K, they will not heat the Earth’s at its average surface temperature of 288̊K. Only radiation of a wavelength less that 10.06 microns, the peak of radiation from a source at 288̊K, will cause heating of the Earth. The probability of an atmospheric CO2 molecule absorbing radiation in one of the three shorter wavelength, ‘hot’, bands is insignificant.
Temperatures of less than 193.5̊K, ie. -79.5̊C, occur occasionally in Antarctica and the surface there is too cold to produce any significant radiation in the three shorter wavelength absorption bands.
Applying the same absorption bands to the Planck function for the Sun’s radiation at 5772̊K adjusted by a divisor of 46,238.8 to provide for the decrease in intensity by the square of the distance apart, gave the following energy values for the respective absorption bands at the Earth’s average distance from the Sun:
a. energy density 3.0256 x 10^-9 Joules per cubic metre, being 1.661 x 10^-4 of the total emission and a photon density of 2.2812 x 10^+11 photons per cubic metre,
b. energy density 1.789 x 10^-8 J/cu.m., being 9.8506 x 10^-4 of the total emission and a photon density of 3.8137 x 10^+11 photons per cu. m.,
c. energy density 7.5175 x 10^-8 J/cu.m., being 4.139 x 10^-3 of the total emission and a photon density of 1.0154 x 10^+12 photons per cu. m.,
d. energy density 5.53 x 10^-8 J/cu.m., being 3.046 x 10^-3 of the total emission and a photon density of 5.5789 x 10^+11 photons per cu. m.
All three of the shorter wavelength, ‘hot’, absorption bands have greater energy density emanating from the Sun than that from the Earth. The greenhouse effect would apply equally well to this incoming radiation and should have caused the Earth to cool as the concentration of atmospheric CO2 increased due to the increase in the amount of radiation back into space before it could warm the Earth.
In the abstract, Witteman [Ref.1], it states:
“Roughly, only 10% of its spectrum is active and the thermal radiation that falls within these regions is fully absorbed. This is not only the case for 400 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere but also for much smaller concentration values.”
Further on in the text, it states:
“The air density is about 2.78 x 10^19 molecules per cm3. The present content of CO2 is 400 ppm or 0.04% so that NCO2 = 1.1 x 10^16 cm3. At atmospheric temperatures practically all molecules are in the vibrational ground state.”
The total photon density from the four emission bands is shown above to be of 6.929 x 10^7 photons per cm3, that is, one photon for every 158,750,000 CO2 molecules. The effect of the absorption and re-emission of the Earth’s radiation at this rate of photons must be completely insignificant as is the current rate of increase in CO2 of 3.4 ppm per annum.
The Executive Summary, page xi, of the UN IPCC report “Climate Change – The IPCC Scientific Assessment” 1990, stated:
“We calculate with confidence that:
• some gases are potentially more effective than others at changing climate, and their relative effectiveness can be estimated Carbon dioxide has been responsible for over half the enhanced greenhouse effect in the past, and is likely to remain so in the future.”
Then in the Policymaker’s Summary, page xiii, it stated:
“ What natural factors are important? ……..
One of the most important factors is the greenhouse effect, a simplified explanation of which is as follows Short-wave solar radiation can pass through the clear atmosphere relatively unimpeded But long-wave terrestrial radiation emitted by the warm surface of the Earth is partially absorbed and then re-emitted by a number of trace gases in the cooler atmosphere above Since, on average, the outgoing long wave radiation balances the incoming solar radiation both the atmosphere and the surface will be warmer than they would be without the greenhouse gases”
Later reports have continued on this theme with an emphasis on the dire consequences that will arise from global warming and the associated climate change.
This analysis has shown that the greenhouse effect arising from the dominant long wavelength CO2 absorption band emanating from the Earth’s surface at 288̊K cannot cause warming of the atmosphere or the surface, but perhaps cooling.
Radiation back into space from the shorter wavelength CO2 absorption bands, emanating from the Sun, should have caused the Earth’s temperature to decrease as the CO2 concentration increased.
Within the limits of measurement, neither of these events have taken place thereby negating the UN IPCC proposition that CO2 has caused global warming or climate change. The factor of the order of 10^8 between the CO2 molecular density in the atmosphere relative to the photon emission from the Earth’s surface shows why there is no measurable effect. This supports the findings from the analysis of climate data from stations across the globe that have shown that the atmospheric temperature is independent of the CO2 concentration but correlates with the annual rate of change of CO2 concentration due to climate change driving the change in CO2.
- W.J.Witteman, The absorption of thermal emitted infrared radiation by CO2.
- HITRAN website, http://www.hitran.ioa.ru , a collaboration between
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CFA), Cambridge, MA, USA,
V.E. Zuev Insitute of Atmosperic Optics (IAO), Tomsk, Russia
National Research Tomsk State University (TSU), Tomsk, Russia